Bioshock 1 vs bioshock 2

[rocketman]

So I've been told to get Bioshock as its an "amazing game" and i'll enjoy it apprently... Anyway, i'm short with money at the moment so i'm deciding which to start with. Bioshock 1 is £10 on Steam i think but Bioshock 2 is £20.

[NECROSSIN]

imo Bioshock 2.

Awesome singleplayer and awesome multiplayers inside of one game.

What else do you need to be happy?

Agree with me, would you kindly... xD

[-RatMan-]

Play BioShock 1 first. Else you don't know what characters are talking about in BioShock 2

[Niek]

played 1 and 2, both very cool, but 2 inst something new on 1, only a multiplayer.

Go for 2. the story does get explained anyway in the intro. Besides, the story in 1 ends as aslo in 2 with two different endings.

[Nobana]

Definately the 1st one. If you would buy Bioshock 2 first, its like watching Star Wars movies in their creation order(4,5,6,1,2,3).

[Botervloot]

Both are good

Play Bioshock 1 first if you want to understand the story a little. Also, 2 is overshadowed by 1.

[CyriusG]

I would say 1 because i though the singleplayer part was more fun and i didn't really like the multiplayer part.

[TheGreenGrasshopper]

I'd suggest 1 first since that's where you learn about rapture, what happened to it and all the different characters. Bioshock 2 assumes that you already know a bit of what's going on.

btw I don't know if they fixed mp but it was rlly laggy for me.

[xeim]

Me too . PLay the first part and then buy the second .

Bioshok 1 : Better singleplayer. Just more fun to play the singleplayer =)

Bioshok 2 : Also a great singleplayer but an even better multiplayer.

I think Bioshok 2 i better but you really should play the first one .. first.^^

Edited August 8, 2010 by xeim

[Nobana]

Me too . PLay the first part and then buy the second .

Bioshok 1 : Better singleplayer. Just more fun to play the singleplayer =) but the multiplayer is nawt that great .

Bioshock 1 doesnt have a multiplayer(?).