RealJesus

"not high" 10/10 would bang anyways :')

I don't mind that either

Do you support letting Mosh and Yoshi delete whichever map they feel deserves to be deleted?

That's option #2 in the poll as I said earlier, it's really the only option that will allow us to make a change from the status quo and build a consensus. Mosh even said on the 4th comment in this thread that he and Yoshi were already doing #2 anyways. Since heavily disliked maps are currently deleted at the discretion of admins, either we propose/suggest a popularly agreed ratio or we let them do their thing I guess. All we should really be discussing is what should be the ratio of like/dislikes that will determine whether a map gets deleted or not. A suggestion could be a map can only be deleted if its total amount of dislikes is minimum 2 times the amount of likes, and the total (likes or dislikes) on such a map needs to be at least 100 in Race and 50 in Mix? Seems to me that people in Mix don't bother as much liking or disliking maps than in Race, added to Race having generally more players. There can be exceptions too, such as classic maps that are loved by old timers and regulars, but disliked due to length or difficulty (e.g. Marathon). Muh Marathon <3

True, but I mean, I guess it depends on what the standard ratio is. If there's like two times more dislikes than likes, it's a good indicator that the map is hated by a good portion of players? Especially if the total number of likes and dislikes is large. Say a map has 30 likes and 60 dislikes, wouldn't that be a good indicator nonetheless? At least in MIX, the players who like/dislike maps are usually regulars from what I could tell (correct me if I'm wrong). Opinions will always vary from person to person (I'd delete half the RTF maps and all DD maps if it were just me) but I wouldn't personally mind deleting clearly hated maps by the majority.

#2 seems like the most rational option. Why have a like/dislike system if it's useless? #1 seems drastic considering the margin and how likes and dislikes could change right before an admin decides to remove a map. Also considering the amount of idiots disliking maps only because they're not good enough to complete it, or trolls disliking maps because they hate the authors or are messing around or whatever, I think #2 is the only option that is actually a consensus between #1 and #3.

Praise the Lord and Her Miracles! #catholic #pray4jebus

question is, rock, do you believe in jebus?

that'd be cool for DD yeah

NTS, SH and even DD (it's just a shit mode because it's boring and redundant) all tend to have the same people winning and making tops because some sort of "skills" have been developed over time by players on these modes. Used to think it was about luck too when I started (especially NTS), and for some maps it really is (Jededo's go forward and free-fall maps for instance), and for tops it kinda is, but when I started playing MIX, I remember Wonas was always winning and now I can beat his ass (te amo roberto) so with time anyone can get better and still have fun. I don't see a big issue with Rock's idea other than any possible technical one (if there is any) regarding the implementation of such a mode. I've never played DM but Rock's idea seems interesting. Would be sort of like RTF with checkpoints, perks (to "kill" other players) and no ghost mode.

High ping related issues, probably, considering the affected players and the context (timed out and whatnot)

replace DD with MH this point; we can't really quantify a player's contribution in CTF 'cause it's mostly good teamwork and blocking too. But overall, CTF is a great mode, it's just plagued by horrible team-players and selfish fools mid-day when the server is full of players, which is why most people don't vote again. Also it's a game mode that lasts longer than others.

For vini and max; numbers matter lads

oh noes :S

too much spam

Above Flipper, as it should be

#1 is many hacks

I'd stalk you bby

RIP ping: I blame DD Also, Yoshi was so deep, damn. Amazing.