Sys speccs & compare

[bAsTiNaToR]

I looked through the forum to find a thread about sys specs and how they perform. The only thread , which deals with rigs is the " Show us your...Rig! thread.

Why I put up this thread? Because I want you to post your specs ( CPU, GPU, amount of RAM and OS etc.), ingame graphics settings and how your sys perform in different games. So if somebody want to upgrade his/(her?) PC, he / she can look in this thread and see how much for example a new gpu could increase the performance. You can also argue about other systems, how to improve your performance and give tips for buying new stuff.

It is not a " Wow look at my upper 1337 pc" thread, so pls post real specs and fps (For those who doesn't know how to do, just download FRAPS it shows you the realtime fps during gaming)and don't make fun of other people because their systems aren't up2date or something else.

If you wanna show us the look of your rig then post the pics in here http://forums.left4green.com/topic/362-show-us-your-er-rig/

I start: Specs:

Cpu: AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3,6 ghz

Gpu: 1x AMD Radeon HD 6950 @ shader mod + default clocks

Ram: 2x 2048 MB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 @ 1333 MHz CL7

SSD: Corsair Force Series 120GB

HDD: Seagate Barracuda ES.2, 500GB, 32MB Cache

Mobo: ASUS M4A79XTD EVO

PSU: Seasonic X-750 Watt

OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit

Game Benchmarks:

CSS: Resolution= 1920x1080, 8x MSAA + 16x af, ingame all maxed out

My fps never drops bellow 200 ( worst case) and max are about 450-500 ( but fps_max at 300)

---

Next game is BFBC2: Resolution see CSS, 8x MSAA , 16x af, ingame maxed out(even HBAO)

Fps @ Isla Inocentes Mp with 32 player: Well min. fps are about 45 ( when everything in front of me explodes) and max about 130, avg. is 70-80

---

Metro 2033 bench:

Settings: 1920x1080, Dx 11, Very High, 4x MSAA, 16x AF, Tessellation & Advanced DoF

( No advanced PhysX, cause I barely see any difference, one explosion during the bench and those few added particles don't make it looks better )

Results from all 5 runs:

Max.: 151,72 fps

Min.: 8,68 fps

Avg.: 41,2 fps

The results came with two graphics cards

---

3DMark11: Performance preset: 7776 (2 graphics card, CPU is the bottleneck) Also 2 cards

I'll add some other games, but now I want U to post your specs and performance

Edited September 3, 2011 by bAsTiNaToR

[Botervloot]

CPU: Q9300 @2.5

GPU: 4890 Sapphire

RAM: 4 GB

OS: Win 7

[CarPileUp]

CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.6 ghz

CPU Cooler: Scythe Mugen 2 [important for OC + 100 times quieter than boxedcooler ]

GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX285

RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR2-1066

Mobo: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

HDD: Samsung SpinPoint F1 640GB + External Western Digital 1TB

PSU: Enermax Pro82+ 625Watt (50A on 12V+ rails)

Chase: Cooler Master CM II 960 Advanced Window Kit Edition

OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit

Monitor: Samsung SynchMaster P2450 24"

Everything runs great. Can play BFBC2 on highest setting and FullHD without any lags.

Pics can be found here:

But you can also click on my sysprofile in my signature

Edited October 21, 2010 by CarPileUp

[deathbycrowbar]

CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3GHz

GPU: AMD Radeon HD5770

Mobo: Asus P5K Premium

RAM: Corsair 4GB 800MHz

PSU: Corsair 620W

Case: Antec 900

HDD: Samsung Spinpoint 500GB

Sound Card: Creative X-Fi extreme gamer

CPU Cooler: Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

Screen: LG 22"

Speakers: Logitech Z4

Mouse: Logitech G9

Keyboard: Cheap one, don't know name.

Runs Crysis Very High 2xAA at about 22fps

Runs Stalker: Call of Pripyat at highest settings DX11 at about 25fps

Edited October 21, 2010 by deathbycrowbar

[bAsTiNaToR]

It would be nc if u can also add how you perform in different games like I did.

Css, BFBC2 etc. it doesn't matter. You don't have to do it, but it would make me happy

[Clavus]

Core i5 750 @ 2.66ghz

4GB DDR3

Sapphire HD5850

Windows 7 Enterprise

Runs everything smoothly (constantly above 60 fps) on highest settings at 1080p. Wouldn't know why anyone would want more than a HD5850. Every frame above 60fps is wasted energy.

[Ywa]

CPU: AMD Athlon64 Phenom II X4 3,2 GHz (4 cores)

GPU: Sapphire ATi Radeon HD4870 with 512 mb memory

Memory: G.E.I.L. 4 GB DDR3 (CL6)

Disks:

• Intel 80 GB SSD (Postville)
  
• 1 TB Samsung Spinpoint
  
• 400 GB Seagate (from old setup)

Next update (will be when HD6800 will be released):

New CPU (AMD Six-core, HD68xx GPU, + 4 GB memory (8 GB total) + New case

[deathbycrowbar]

Core i5 750 @ 2.66ghz

4GB DDR3

Sapphire HD5850

Windows 7 Enterprise

Runs everything smoothly (constantly above 60 fps) on highest settings at 1080p. Wouldn't know why anyone would want more than a HD5850. Every frame above 60fps is wasted energy.

tbh anything above 24fps is wasted energy. Films run at 24fps and nobody ever complains that they are laggy. Even my 5770 can play any game at this speed with them still looking nice. The fact is, graphics are going to remain at the same level until new consoles come out and that is not going to be for at least another 3-5 years or so.

[bAsTiNaToR]

Wouldn't know why anyone would want more than a HD5850. Every frame above 60fps is wasted energy.

Because some people are using higher / custom anti-aliasing / super sample aa, which requires power.

Some people call them freaks other enthusiasts. Those peopele often play with a high resolution(2560x1600 and more), 3D gaming, multi monitor setups etc.

That's why nVdia and AMD are producing cards like the gtx 480 or the HD 5970.

Edited October 21, 2010 by bAsTiNaToR

[Ywa]

Core i5 750 @ 2.66ghz

4GB DDR3

Sapphire HD5850

Windows 7 Enterprise

Runs everything smoothly (constantly above 60 fps) on highest settings at 1080p. Wouldn't know why anyone would want more than a HD5850. Every frame above 60fps is wasted energy.

tbh anything above 24fps is wasted energy. Films run at 24fps and nobody ever complains that they are laggy. Even my 5770 can play any game at this speed with them still looking nice. The fact is, graphics are going to remain at the same level until new consoles come out and that is not going to be for at least another 3-5 years or so.

Clavus: Everything above 60 fps can't be noticed. Because most screen have a limit of 60 Hz. However, physics will run smoother. And the general experience can become better above 60 too (read my reply to deathbycrowbar's post).

deathbycrowbar: Unlike movies, games never have a stable frames per second. For example. Frame 1 takes 50 ms to calculate. And Frame 2 takes 25 ms. Next frame is 50 again. If you watch it, it feels shocky. Same goes for 60 fps. The 60 frames are never stable. Thus when going above 60, there's a higher chance your screen picks a recent render. In movies there's always xx milliseconds between every frame. So it doesn't feel shocky/unstable.

This is the easy explanation. It works partially different. But that's relatively difficult to explain.

[Deluvas]

tbh anything above 24fps is wasted energy. Films run at 24fps and nobody ever complains that they are laggy. Even my 5770 can play any game at this speed with them still looking nice. The fact is, graphics are going to remain at the same level until new consoles come out and that is not going to be for at least another 3-5 years or so.

Not true. Firstly, frames per second can mean anything from rendering to computing. Secondly, as Ywa said, they aren't constant. Finally, this isn't a debate thread.

CPU: Phenom II x4 945 @ 3.0 Ghz

Memory: DDR2 @ 800 Mhz (Corsair)

HDD: 750 GB WD @ 32 Mb cache

Video: Sapphire 4850 (stock cooler)

OS: Windows 7 (LEGIT, bitches)

Screen: 1x 17" + 1x 22" (both LG)

PSU: @ CarPileUp: CHINABOMB (XILENCE 600W -- probably 350-400 real W)

Edited October 21, 2010 by Deluvas

[Damien]

My system:

CPU: Intel dual core E6850 @3.0 ghz

GPU: Club3D Radeon HD4870 1 gb OC

Mobo: Gigabyte ga-ep35-ds3

RAM: Corsair 4GB 800MHz

PSU: Cooler master 550w

Case: modified steel case

HDD: Seagate barracuda 500gb [st-3500418as]

Sound Card: Creative X-Fi extreme gamer fatality pro

CPU Cooler: Standard intel cooling [case already has enough cooling + i dont OC]

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

2 Screens: Samsung syncmaster p2770H and a 226BW both @720P

Mouse: Razer Diamondback 3G earthgreen

Mousemat: Steelseries Qck+ mini

Keyboard: Logitech G19

Hl2: avg: 150 fps max: around 400 fps min: 50 fps [ aa @ 8x and as @ 16x rest=maxed]

garrysmod zs avg: 80 fps [ aa @ 8x and as @ 16x rest=maxed]

[CarPileUp]

PSU: @ CarPileUp: CHINABOMB (XILENCE 600W -- probably 350-400 real W)

True, true XD

Edited October 21, 2010 by CarPileUp

[Darkstar]

CPU: Core i7 720QM @ 1.66 to 2.8GHz

Graphics Card: Radeon Mobility 4650

RAM: Elpida (OEM shite) 4GB DDR3, cant remember frequency, will check when laptop isnt in bits.

Hard Drive: 2x 500GB Seagate Momentus 7200rpm (ST9500420AS)

OS: Win 7 Pro (Gotta love friends with TechNet accounts )

[CyriusG]

CPU: INTEL CORE 2 DUO E8400 @ 3.96GHZ

GPU: NVIDIA GTX 275 (FOR NOW)

RAM: CORSAIR 4GIG @ 880MHZ

HARDDRIVE: 80GIG FOR OS AND 640GIG FOR EVERYTHING ELSE

OS: WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE

AND YES I HAVE TO HAVE CAPS BECAUSE IT'S THE INTERNATIONAL CAPS DAY TODAY.

[CarPileUp]

CPU: INTEL CORE 2 DUO E8400 @ 3.96GHZ

GPU: NVIDIA GTX 275 (FOR NOW)

RAM: CORSAIR 4GIG @ 880MHZ

HARDDRIVE: 80GIG FOR OS AND 640GIG FOR EVERYTHING ELSE

OS: WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE

AND YES I HAVE TO HAVE CAPS BECAUSE IT'S THE INTERNATIONAL CAPS DAY TODAY.

WJAT

[bAsTiNaToR]

Some games + fps would be nice, but not necessary. Wanna see how crapy those nVidia cards are.

@ CPU: Can play BFBC2 on highest setting and FullHD without any lags = 8x aa, 16x af and HBAO ? Some fps pls.

Edited October 22, 2010 by bAsTiNaToR

[Damien]

I will post some fps benchs later, but i cant use my computer for a while.

I really hate nvidia cards, they have cost me alot of money [ a 8600 gt with a factory error and a 9600 gso with a fried supply chip and a few years back my fx 5200 just didnt work nomore. All my ati cards i have ever bought still work, even an old 9600 pro works fine ]

[BlueYoshi97]

In Multi Theft Auto: San Andreas I usually have around 35 FPS.

So yeah.

Edited October 22, 2010 by BlueYoshi97

[CarPileUp]

Some games + fps would be nice, but not necessary. Wanna see how crapy those nVidia cards are.

@ CPU: Can play BFBC2 on highest setting and FullHD without any lags = 8x aa, 16x af and HBAO ? Some fps pls.

Yes maxed out. ~25-30 FPS

Edited October 22, 2010 by CarPileUp

[bAsTiNaToR]

HAHAHAHAHAHA ... I lol'd pretty hard. No I didn't. I want this thread to be used as I expected it to be used. So please don't post such useless stuff , same for CPU.

Edited October 22, 2010 by bAsTiNaToR

[BlueYoshi97]

HAHAHAHAHAHA ... I lol'd pretty hard. No I didn't. I want this thread to be used as I expected it to be used. So please don't post such useless stuff please, same for CPU.

ok

[CarPileUp]

HAHAHAHAHAHA ... I lol'd pretty hard. No I didn't. I want this thread to be used as I expected it to be used. So please don't post such useless stuff , same for CPU.

-snip-

Edited October 22, 2010 by CarPileUp

[DQuaN]

CPU: Intel Quad Core Q6600

RAM: 2GB Corsair II Extreme

GPU: NVIDIA 8800GT 512MB

Running Windows 7 Home Premium x64

Screen: Philips 37inch 720p LCD TV

Sound: LG 5.1 Surround

Downloading FRAPS so I can test out some FPS. It runs most games pretty well. I can play BioShock2 on full amongst other games. I built it over 2 years ago though so it's well out of date (was the muts nuts at the time!). Just can't justify the cost of a mew build. I could just upgrade the RAM and GPU but I'd really like to move to an i7.

Edited October 22, 2010 by DQuaN

[bAsTiNaToR]

I could just upgrade the RAM and GPU but I'd really like to move to an i7.

Upgrading the Ram is very important. Windows 7 with 2 gb isn't that good. And if you work with videocut or use other programms, which require cpu power / support HT, an i7 might be perfect, but if you just play computer games you should think about an AMD Phenom II X4 955 or an Intel i5 760. Both are good cpus which are pretty cheap and perfect for gaming.

Edited October 22, 2010 by bAsTiNaToR