Raptor Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) He ain't narrow minded in the part he says it looks exactly the same as MW2,anyway I'm probably gonna buy it to just for the single player campaign (the only reason why u should buy this if you got MW2).But since I don't got MW2 I'm probably gonna check the multy player out.But as said before it's gonna be the same as MW2;-players who play the game just for their killstreak-lame campers behind fridges - ...Oh great! You counted 2 examples down and both describe the behaviour of players.You know, it is obvious that MW3 hasn't improved its engine that much and we all know that, but this poor list doesn't impress anyone. Map design and Weapons force the players to use stereotypical techniqeusand I am sure that some people play the MP for fun with friends and not because of Killstreacks <.<I'm fine when people call it MW2.5, but it kinda makes me angry that you really think you could use that as a valid argumentagainst Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3. It's still something special for people who never touched a CoD game.Edit: How can you even say it's the same when you haven't played MW2? :/ Edited November 4, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
Reiska Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 so you will buy it for singleplayer only? what kind shit is that just download it illegally atleast the singleplayer will work and you dont waste your money to that piece of crab Quote Link to comment
terminator Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Why in fucks name would you play this this shit after bf3 it's miles behind... rotorcopter 1 Quote Link to comment
Silver Dot Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) All the trailers look like Michael fucking Bay movies.Oh wait.Anyways, it's gonna suck ass. We already agreed on this, right? Why is thread here? As Hundred said, I'll probably download it for singleplayer.Just watched the second video on the post above mine, it looks exactly like MW2.No, that wasn't what 'we' agreed on. Stop being such a narrow minded little child. If this is what the BF3 captain of arguments is like then it's actually a real shame for you.I'm not being narrow-minded. I may have made a mistake saying 'we' but Call Of Duty is an incredibly horrible game franchise. It started dropping after CoD4, game by game. I'm not being a Battlefield fanboy, I'm not even a 'veteran' of Battlefield. Yes, while there are kids who think Battlefield 3 is significantly better than any other CoD game and just shoot down any argument or logical complaint with "at least it's not CoD", I am not one of them. I am speaking on my own & personal experience that I hate the games. I sincerely despise them and regret buying MW2 and WaW. Black Ops was okay.Oh great! You counted 2 examples down and both describe the behaviour of players.You know, it is obvious that MW3 hasn't improved its engine that much and we all know that, but this poor list doesn't impress anyone.It's not supposed to impress anyone. It's supposed to point out that the developers are not spending any time whatsoever doing their jobs while they should be putting effort into a good, memorable and fun game. Map design and Weapons force the players to use stereotypical techniqeusSo we should praise the developers for creating such shitty maps where you can only use shitty techniques and tactics? Just say "they did their best" when they had eight fucking games to think about and realize what the players want and like? How it can be fun and challenging at the same time?I'm fine when people call it MW2.5, but it kinda makes me angry that you really think you could use that as a valid argumentagainst Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3. It is MW 2.5. It has nothing other than a retarded storyline (honestly how the fuck does one man start a war), new weapons and new maps. This is a DLC to MW2 with added singleplayer missions. That is not worth what MW3 is worth (like 60$?, i dunno). I can get much more enjoyment from STALKER (multiplayer and singleplayer) and y'kno how much that costs? 20$.It's still something special for people who never touched a CoD game. This may be the only point in your post I agree with, but you should think about the players who did touch CoD, too. I'm guessing mostly people who have had experience with CoD will buy this.Edit: How can you even say it's the same when you haven't played MW2? :/Compare these two videos: I don't know about you but I don't see much difference. I've also played MW2. Edited November 4, 2011 by Silver Dot Quote Link to comment
Mathijs1996 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) He ain't narrow minded in the part he says it looks exactly the same as MW2,anyway I'm probably gonna buy it to just for the single player campaign (the only reason why u should buy this if you got MW2).But since I don't got MW2 I'm probably gonna check the multy player out.But as said before it's gonna be the same as MW2;-players who play the game just for their killstreak-lame campers behind fridges - ...Oh great! You counted 2 examples down and both describe the behaviour of players.You know, it is obvious that MW3 hasn't improved its engine that much and we all know that, but this poor list doesn't impress anyone. Map design and Weapons force the players to use stereotypical techniqeusand I am sure that some people play the MP for fun with friends and not because of Killstreacks <.<I'm fine when people call it MW2.5, but it kinda makes me angry that you really think you could use that as a valid argumentagainst Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3. It's still something special for people who never touched a CoD game.Edit: How can you even say it's the same when you haven't played MW2? :/Start comparing the videos and actually listen to what they say in "what they've changed" vids.The only thing they changed is;some new sounds for the weapons (who cares after all? like everyone was complaining the sounds sucked ?!)Better graphics .. (big improvement huh ?)And some new weapons ..And some new maps, which mostly look like other maps that have been in COD series before.Oh yea don't forget the amazing number of 10 new guns !And that in 2 years !?I hope for them their singleplayer campaign is pretty good otherwise it's just a mw2 with an extension for 60 bloody euros !No thank you then I'll but something like battlefield 3 or skyrim ! Oh WOW they've even copied the battlefield bad company 2 UAV helicopter in this game ... Edited November 4, 2011 by Mathijs1996 Quote Link to comment
TheGreenGrasshopper Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 All the trailers look like Michael fucking Bay movies.Oh wait.Anyways, it's gonna suck ass. We already agreed on this, right? Why is thread here? As Hundred said, I'll probably download it for singleplayer.Just watched the second video on the post above mine, it looks exactly like MW2.No, that wasn't what 'we' agreed on. Stop being such a narrow minded little child. If this is what the BF3 captain of arguments is like then it's actually a real shame for you.I'm not being narrow-minded. I may have made a mistake saying 'we' but Call Of Duty is an incredibly horrible game franchise. It started dropping after CoD4, game by game. I'm not being a Battlefield fanboy, I'm not even a 'veteran' of Battlefield. Yes, while there are kids who think Battlefield 3 is significantly better than any other CoD game and just shoot down any argument or logical complaint with "at least it's not CoD", I am not one of them. I am speaking on my own & personal experience that I hate the games. I sincerely despise them and regret buying MW2 and WaW. Black Ops was okay. Black ops was okay? Say what now? I seriously did not like Black ops, it usually turned out in servers going 24/7 nuketown, killstreaks where easy to get and it seemed like entire servers were filled with noobs waiting to get raped.I'm fine when people call it MW2.5, but it kinda makes me angry that you really think you could use that as a valid argumentagainst Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3. It is MW 2.5. It has nothing other than a retarded storyline (honestly how the fuck does one man start a war), new weapons and new maps. This is a DLC to MW2 with added singleplayer missions. That is not worth what MW3 is worth (like 60$?, i dunno). I can get much more enjoyment from STALKER (multiplayer and singleplayer) and y'kno how much that costs? 20$.How old is STALKER already man? I can have loads of fun with tetris, I can play that for free on facebook AND it's ages old I don't see your point in that.I totally agree on the 60€ thing though, way too overpriced.Oh and how does one man start a war? Idk ask Hitler or Napoleon, I bet they can answer that for you.It's still something special for people who never touched a CoD game. This may be the only point in your post I agree with, but you should think about the players who did touch CoD, too. I'm guessing mostly people who have had experience with CoD will buy this.Why do you say that? A friend of mine bought BF3, he only played BF2 and he was amazed at the slightest things even though (imo) it looks a lot like bad company 2. People who are new to CoD will buy it and so will people who have played CoD a tonI agree with everything else I didn't comment on, or don't have an argument against. Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Yup, that is true, but as I said.. It's still something special for people who never touched a CoD game.I never touched MW, so I guess it's still something new for me.First try it, then dislike it, huh? Or maybe I'll like it Quote Link to comment
Dr. Pannenkoek Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Why in fucks name would you play this this shit after bf3 it's miles behind...Origin? Quote Link to comment
BlueYoshi97 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 You people are so amusing. You've read too many war stories.You act like there should always be 1 good and 1 bad. Why can't you accept that BF3 and MW3 may be BOTH be awesam? Sacrevy, Mr. Darkness and Nobana 3 Quote Link to comment
Corby Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Most anticipated game? Nope.aviThat's been reserved for Skyrim!But I do like the campaign for the Modern Warfare series, and if they do have dedicated servers, I might want to think about actually buying it.Most anticipated game? Yes.aviI do believe that's reserved by number of sales. He ain't narrow minded in the part he says it looks exactly the same as MW2,anyway I'm probably gonna buy it to just for the single player campaign (the only reason why u should buy this if you got MW2).But since I don't got MW2 I'm probably gonna check the multy player out.But as said before it's gonna be the same as MW2;-players who play the game just for their killstreak-lame campers behind fridges - ...Your entire argument is invalid because you don't even know the differences between the game, not to mention you haven't even touched EITHER of them. Please just stop, you have no grounds to argue. http://www.g-forums.net/call-duty-series/2567-difference-between-mw2-engine-mw3-engine.htmlPretty good improvement I'd say ^so you will buy it for singleplayer only? what kind shit is that just download it illegally atleast the singleplayer will work and you dont waste your money to that piece of crabLots of people play for the campaign, the only reason I'd buy BF3 (Which I never will) is to try the campaign as I just generally disliked it's multiplayer. Found it slow paced and home to campers, but then again I prefer to 'run and gun'. Why in fucks name would you play this this shit after bf3 it's miles behind...I will quote you once again to lol @ you when it get's destroyed in sales. It is MW 2.5. It has nothing other than a retarded storyline (honestly how the fuck does one man start a war), new weapons and new maps. This is a DLC to MW2 with added singleplayer missions. That is not worth what MW3 is worth (like 60$?, i dunno). I can get much more enjoyment from STALKER (multiplayer and singleplayer) and y'kno how much that costs? 20$.Clearly if you don't think one man can start an entire war, you have no knowledge on modern day politics or news. As for your comparison videos, they've already stated there will only be minor changes, no-one gave a fuck. Why change something that had such HUGE success. It's called smarts.I hope for them their singleplayer campaign is pretty good otherwise it's just a mw2 with an extension for 60 bloody euros !No thank you then I'll but something like battlefield 3 or skyrim !And yet BF3 is already out and you haven't bought it? Quote Link to comment
Nobana Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) so you will buy it for singleplayer only? what kind shit is that just download it illegally atleast the singleplayer will work and you dont waste your money to that piece of crabLrn2writeproperEnglish. And not everyone prefers downloading games.Why in fucks name would you play this this shit after bf3 it's miles behind...Graphically yes. Otherwise they are just two different games in totally different leagues with totally different style. Call of Duty's dont try to be like Battlefield. Battlefield tries to be more and more like CoD, doesnt that tell you something?CAN WE KEEP THIS THREAD ABOUT MODERN-WARFARE-3? THERE ALREADY WAS A MW3 vs. BF3 -THREAD, which turned into hating. Edited November 4, 2011 by Nobana Quote Link to comment
Schreffy3 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) So. Much. Hate. Battlefield 3 and MW3 are two completely different games. You cannot compare the two.Why must this be a flamewar? Edited November 4, 2011 by Schreffy3 Quote Link to comment
Sacrevy Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 You people are so amusing. You've read too many war stories.You act like there should always be 1 good and 1 bad. Why can't you accept that BF3 and MW3 may be BOTH be awesam?+1 Quote Link to comment
EmRA Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I think people just accepect different opinions.Might be easier for your blood pressure Quote Link to comment
Mathijs1996 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I hope for them their singleplayer campaign is pretty good otherwise it's just a mw2 with an extension for 60 bloody euros !No thank you then I'll but something like battlefield 3 or skyrim !And yet BF3 is already out and you haven't bought it?No since my current pc can't handel the game ...When i get a new pc i'll buy it no matter what bullshit you gonna say ... Quote Link to comment
TheGreenGrasshopper Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Man I wish there was more gameplay footage leaked, but apparently Activision is putting strikes or something on everyone who does upload gameplay of MW3.It's going to be a hell of a lot more challenging with the juggernaut killstreak seeing how if the entire team has it equiped it would be 6jugs (with 10x hp) vs 6 normal guys. Although you only have a riot shield and pistol as juggernaut (support). Quote Link to comment
Corby Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I hope for them their singleplayer campaign is pretty good otherwise it's just a mw2 with an extension for 60 bloody euros !No thank you then I'll but something like battlefield 3 or skyrim !And yet BF3 is already out and you haven't bought it?No since my current pc can't handel the game ...When i get a new pc i'll buy it no matter what bullshit you gonna say ...The only firm bullshit is coming from you with your 1-sided arguments. Go play all the games involved then you can comment. Idiot. Quote Link to comment
Darkstar Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Will you all stop flaming in here otherwise I will lock the BF3 topic and remove any future ones. DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR? Quote Link to comment
Reiska Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 (edited) I don't give a damn how I write as long as you understand what I mean, and I think its stupid to pay like 60e for only singleplayer what can be played in 2 days Edited November 5, 2011 by Reiska Quote Link to comment
Navo Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 (edited) cod is superbad and unrealistic only babies play, battlefield is for big strong grown mans Edited November 5, 2011 by Navo Quote Link to comment
TheGreenGrasshopper Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Lock this thread TC. It's useless, filled with flaming from BF3 fanboys, you can't post any usefull information without getting an argument why for some reason it's a negative addition. MATURITY LEVEL IN THIS THREAD: Below Freezing-point Quote Link to comment
Nobana Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I think the flaming stopped. And besides, Modern Warfare 3 needs a thread of its own, it still is one of the biggest games being released this year. Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 (edited) At least they now how to enertain their fanboys Edited November 5, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
oDi_W Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 I think the flaming stopped. And besides, Modern Warfare 3 needs a thread of its own, it still is one of the biggest games being released this year.Since it stopped, the Admin can (if i'm right) delete all the other flaming posts.Just suggesting.I like MW2. It gives me lots of gaming fun. And since i like FPS games i'll buy both MW3 and BF3. I'm looking forward to play both! Quote Link to comment
Mathijs1996 Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 At least they now how to enertain their fanboys best commercial for a video game that I've ever seen xD Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.