Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) Blah Edited November 28, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) But is it really a major need that could cause WW 3? Or is it just the will of a single man that is needed?Of course, there was nothing that could cause WW3 yet, but it is very likely that things could mess up our current state very badly. Not a major need, or the will of a whole Nation. A gesture, a symbol a special event could cause a war. If people of a mighty nation are crying out for help or for change those people will become irritated and fierced. But would they cry out for war? Nope, but could someone take that currentstate for his advantage? Yeah! For example 'The 30 Years War' between 1618 and 1648 in europe (it wasn't a war that went 30 years, but it were13 wars with 10 Peace agreements withing those 30 years). It was a european war were the Protestant wanted more rights (one reason of the war with a direct connection to the event I am talking about), after all it was more of a war for religion and there were a lot of conflicts about this problem with the Protestant before. Everyone already expected something to happen. At the end there was one single event that brought up this war. Something that we haven't forget to date. The Defenestration of Prague at the 23rd of May, 1618, when the Protastant through those 3 allegiance of the king out of the window. An single event, done by a few people caused a War that most already have been expecting. You find this Information in every good history book I found these Informations here and here (a german news letter and one of those shool websites where students can look up informations for presentations and more. Yes, I am too lazy to send you an english website ;O)I'm not expecting a war anymore, but I want to support my last un-finished arguments Edited November 28, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
Baron Baconeer Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 You do understand that people didn't have WMD:s four centuries ago. Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 I see what you mean. It isn't like they had to worry about destroying the whole planet with one strike,but what if something happens that could anger one of both? They couldn't kiss hands and say 'Sorry, simple mistake'. I'm talking about one part being really pissed because of something really terrible that has happened. Nobody wants a war, but is it really impossible ? Quote Link to comment
Navo Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 I have no clue what the fuck a religious conflict in the 17th century has to do with current affairs. Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) I'm speaking about that I think single events can cause wars, because they bring eveyrthing out of hand when two enemies are already exasperated..As a reply to: The world wouldn't risk a global war again unless there was some major need. -The Lazy PeonI thought The Defenestration of Prague would be the perfect exampleThere is no use in keeping this whole topic going :/ Edited November 28, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
Tom Klijbroek Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 A world war has to be started by the Germans, they already invade and conquer our beaches every summer. Quote Link to comment
Griffon Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 A world war has to be started by the Germans, they already invade and conquer our beaches every summer.Clearly you dont live in the UK, we dont get summers. Quote Link to comment
Mathematic Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Clearly you haven't been in the Netherlands. Weather is shitty over here. ALWAYS. Quote Link to comment
Clavus Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Clearly you haven't been in the Netherlands. Weather is shitty over here. ALWAYS.It's actually worse in the UK. Quote Link to comment
Mr. Darkness Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 If I leave any of my opinions in here, you are gonna hate me All of you. Quote Link to comment
Baron Baconeer Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 If I leave any of my opinions in here, you are gonna hate me All of you.No no no.We are going to LAUGH at you. Quote Link to comment
BlueYoshi97 Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Clearly you haven't been in the Netherlands. Weather is shitty over here. ALWAYS.Clearly you haven't been in Norway. I been there 5 weeks in the summer, in which I had a total of 3 days of sun, and a total of 2 days of no rain. The biggest part of the days was just non-stop raining.And humans are stupid. Greedyness is taking over the world. People are complaining with what they haven't, instead of enjoying of what they have, and pretty much everyone is being ignorant and selfish.I always try to ignore the politics as much as I can, it only gets me depressed. Raptor 1 Quote Link to comment
Luke Nukem Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Religion is the only reason why war was brought upon us. Raptor 1 Quote Link to comment
Silver Dot Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) Long story short: Russia is pretty hard core but what abou the USA?What about their weapons and their idiologies after they become a total facistic nation?We could get involved in such a war (no shit) and we would be pretty fucked.Just because some people did some nasty shit doesn't mean they're gonna do it again. In WW2, there wasn't a side in the war that didn't commit war crimes. Including the majestic and heroic United States.The world has 'advanced', however. Russia isn't 'hardcore', it's just Russia. The shit you're talking about was the Soviet Union, which was a scary dictatorship masked under communism. It was Stalinism, which isn't different from Fascism or whatever Hitler had in mind.Also, invading the States would be retarded. At least 10% of the population are citizens equipped with personal defense weapons. Nuclear weapons would be bad for the economy and would create a second Great Depression. If history has taught us anything, it's that the people will probably rise up against the military, rebellion and such. Nuclear weapons are also pretty much banned, if you fuck up, the UN is gonna rape your ass.You gotta look at the big picture.Religion is the only reason why war was brought upon us.lol Edited November 28, 2011 by Silver Dot Hundred2 1 Quote Link to comment
Mr. Darkness Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) The world has 'advanced', however. Russia isn't 'hardcore', it's just Russia. The shit you're talking about was the Soviet Union, which was a scary dictatorship masked under communism. It was Stalinism, which isn't different from Fascism or whatever Hitler had in mind.UMAD BRO? Edited November 28, 2011 by Mr. Darkness Quote Link to comment
Hundred2 Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 That is the shittiest attempt at a comeback / playing umad bro for laughs I have ever been able to lay my eyes on. Silver Dot, BlueYoshi97, Nobana and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) The world has 'advanced', however. Russia isn't 'hardcore', it's just Russia. The shit you're talking about was the Soviet Union, which was a scary dictatorship masked under communism. It was Stalinism, which isn't different from Fascism or whatever Hitler had in mind.Oh, sorry I meant Soviet Union. Didn't want to offend anybody :/Isn't admiring the Soviet Union like admiring the 3rd Reich? Not the smartest move Darkness....... :/ Edited November 28, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
Dr.Minky Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Dey got swagga tho Quote Link to comment
Balmung Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Who cares. World ends in 2012 anyway. Quote Link to comment
Navo Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 The world has 'advanced', however. Russia isn't 'hardcore', it's just Russia. The shit you're talking about was the Soviet Union, which was a scary dictatorship masked under communism. It was Stalinism, which isn't different from Fascism or whatever Hitler had in mind.UMAD BRO?I think it is more likely he is amused by that pathetic attempt to governing a state. Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 I think it is more likely he is amused by that pathetic attempt to governing a state.He could also just say:"I am amused by that pathetic attempt to governing a state."Like that he wouldn't make fun of a system and an age in which many people where killed and tortured :/ Quote Link to comment
Luke Nukem Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 In Russia no one has a right to say what they want. So what is the point actually discussing change or leadership in Russia? Quote Link to comment
Raptor Posted November 28, 2011 Author Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) We aren't....? Who cares about Putin? Edited November 28, 2011 by Raptor Quote Link to comment
EmRA Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 ITT: There is only black or white, good or bad Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.